When a wife yells at her husband, who has his eyes glued to his desktop screen, “You are not listening to me!” she is dead on, he’s not. But does that mean he’s not engaged?
Actually, he is very engaged…with what is in front of him on the screen. People are always engaged; it just may not be with what we consider to be important and that is a critical element that managers often miss and fail to have curiosity about.
As managers, what we often don’t seem to get is that our role is not so much to create engagement, as it is to direct it. If this sounds counter to what you have been reading, told or imagined yourself I offer no apologies but I do ask that you seriously consider what I am proposing.
As managers, what we often don’t seem to get is that our role is not so much to create engagement, as it is to direct it.
A manager in a program I was delivering recently asked what she could do about the attitude of one of the younger workers reporting to her, he just didn’t seem as committed to his work as she would have liked. I asked about the quality of his work, she indicated that it was OK but just OK.
OK but just OK is an indication that the young employee is sufficiently engaged to comply with what is expected of him. I asked the manager if just OK was a problem and her response was telling. “I’d like to see more enthusiasm from him.” All right, now we were getting somewhere, the manager was confused. I mentioned to her that what she wanted was a personal preference not a legitimate requirement of the job. She didn’t seem to like this very much so we continued. I asked her if there was anything he did seem committed to and she responded sharply, “Well, fantasy football!” So I proceed to ask whether she had ever asked him what he found so engaging about fantasy football? I could tell by the look on her face that she was shocked and maybe even offended by my question and her response matched her facial expression, “Why should I have to do that?”
I am a very pragmatic guy, I try to stay focused on what works and leave the judgments and moralizations to people who have more time than I do, or maybe who actually care about this kind of thing. You tell me you have a problem I begin looking for a solution, I don’t worry about who is right or wrong or what should be happening. Actually, I think this may be most manager’s problem with engagement, they are operating like there is some ideal state and there are really only two states and neither is ideal 1) You are getting what you want or 2) you are not getting what you want.
My response to the manager rocked her back even further. “Look” I said, “You brought up the issue, you are apparently the one with the problem. I am looking at the situation and seeing whether we can uncover a way to get in communication with this young guy since telling him he needs to be more committed does not seem to be getting the job done. Would you agree with that?” She then nodded her head yes. “So now”, I said, “You have an option available that wasn’t there before, you can give up your agenda and explore his interests or you can continue being right about his attitude. Which approach looks like it might have more promise?”
Honestly I don’t know how this turned out since that was the last time I saw that particular manager. Based on the conversation I’d say she stuck with her agenda, at least a little while longer.
This engagement stuff is challenging business; many “jobs” are really not that naturally engaging if we are honest about it. If you are serious about wanting engaged employees you need to face the need to get up close and personal with the people who report to you. Are you up to the challenge?
When faced with the need to redirect an employee’s focus of engagement ask yourself if you are willing to discover what’s in it for them? If nothing comes immediately to mind you may want to hold off until you can get interested in them.